Ken Johnson

Marking this as approved and removing "Proposal" as... well, it's been approved :)

Fair enough - can we agree to remove "Proposal" from the title since the issues grown to be approved?

@RubyNova - would we need to publish the C# bindings as a NuGet package first for the .NET project to be able to reference them? Or would we rather build...

I'm not sure what is meant by how has this changed - you mean the objective of the SDK? How C# is included?

Note: may need to squash commits upon approval

FWIW, this is post-MVP. ATM, I can see that it would condense us to only having one particular library to link against, which may save for some headache on the...

Just noting - Nice to have, but not required for our MVP

You need to build on a machine with Wayland support in order to publish with Wayland support, if I understand correctly, so essentially the build machine would need to support...

We _can_, if desired, force users to only use the SDK instead of vendoring? Just putting the option out there

I'll take this since the SDK is dependent on it.