Noah Lev
Noah Lev
We should discuss [this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3662#discussion_r1735147546) before stabilization. In the meantime, this RFC needs to get actually merged, so I'll do that now. :)
**Huzzah!** The @rust-lang/rustdoc team has decided **to accept** this RFC. To track further discussion, subscribe to the tracking issue here: rust-lang/rust#130676
Yeah, the Typst-based syntax seems like the most intuitive option for Markdown IMO. No change of existing syntax, really, except for an expansion of how it can be used. EDIT:...
I would like to write the documentation.
Note that right now the feature is named inline-const pretty much everywhere.
Not sure what to do about the disappearance of `// in scope 0` source-span comments. I mean, of course we should delete them if they're no longer shown, but do...
Ok, it looks like this is the change: rust-lang/rust@0a1fa411edbf6f9ad1205655d77cfda5a43aac06. And there's an open PR to restore comments: rust-lang/rust#114652
See also rust-lang/rust#65031.
Yes, I was hoping for different team members to reply, but I wasn't sure whether to ping people, so I [posted on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/information.20requested!).