Callum Forrester

@DominicOram Are you seeing this behaviour?

From discussion, this may have gone away in #1664, so this issue is now for writing a confirming test

Reviewers: @danielballan @DominicOram

It seems to have been xfailed by an unspecified change in ophyd behavoir: https://github.com/bluesky/bluesky/pull/1036#issuecomment-390434164 However, it now passes when I run it locally so the xfail may be removable? While...

Reviewers: @tacaswell or @danielballan (or they can delegate), @callumforrester

@abbiemery is this related to/still likely to happen following #1651?

Reviewers: @DominicOram @keithralphs

Relates to https://github.com/bluesky/ophyd-async/issues/195

@untzag Possibly something like #1596 could serve as the underlying verb for lots of useful plan stubs such as `wait_for_value`, the difference is that #1596 generates a status object under...

Reviewers: everyone present