Danielle Leonard

I believe we still do not save the transfer functions. Is this something we still want? I can see it being useful, especially for modified gravity applications. @damonge @dkirkby?

I think this issue may be obsolete because we now include multiple boltzmann codes so we are no longer benchmarking against camb (since we integrated it). We may still want...

@AlexGKim - can I ask if this is still something you would want? Sorry this issue has been hanging so long.

Okay, good to know. Do you think it would make sense to include it in the v3 milestone? (v3 is basically the proxy for the version we want for paper...

@AlexGKim yes that's about right - from an independent code. This can be anything from another existing public code base to something somebody has sitting on their laptop from a...

@philbull how are we feeling about this issue currently?

Sorry this is probably silly but I don't really understand what you mean by release branches. The releases are made off ther master branch - what am I missing? @beckermr

@slosar @sukhdeep1989 is it still the plan that these parts of covariance functionality live in CCL or has this changed?

@beckermr is this resolved by the above merged PR?

Ah okay thanks, sorry.