Danielle Leonard

@patricialarsen - It looks like this is an issue that occurs with halofit in general rather than CCL. I'm not sure we have any immediate fix available.

@pennalima that would be great - what halo profile capabilities does NumCosmo have? I am not super familiar with Colossus is this an equivalent code? Sorry, I should know that.

Okay, that's great to know, thanks @pennalima! From what I can see we do already seem to have benchmark comparisons for most of the standard iterations of these cases, just...

@damonge bumping the above question - have I understood right what's missing in benchmarks from the halo profile stuff?

Sorry for the delay on this @pennalima . This is a good place to do make a list, yep. Are you interested in only discussing the benchmarks we are missing...

@pennalima Okay, thanks. So, would it be correct to say that what you are looking for is basically the same list as above in the first post of this issue,...

Putting this here for reference: discussion of related issues in page 21 of this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.12928v1.pdf

@elisachisari are we happy with this issue being resolved or do you want to wait till we merge the benchmark notebook pr?

@elisachisari do we know if this is still something that is wanted in terms of baryonic corrections? or is something else a priority at this point?

How are we doing on this these days? Are we happy with the current size of the repo? I can do another dead-branch-purge if we want.