Byron

I ran into this as well. It seems like a bunch of types (e.g. `DirectusUser`) implement the `Node` type, but don't have the required `id: ID` field.

nope, don't see any drawbacks. However, I think that if `react-flexbox-layout` is required, there will most likely be at least one flexbox component, so it's pretty safe to just start...

ahh I see. yea that's a good idea. I'm all for it On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:56 AM Leonardo Garcia Crespo < [email protected]> wrote: > I was thinking...

@jaszczw thanks for this. could you explain how to repro the issue that this fixes? I believe we still need that `display: table !important`. If we don't put `!important` there,...

ah man, didn't know React had that limitation :( okay, I think a better fix would be to apply another class name to the element, for example `noFlexGrow`. Then, add...

Hey, thanks for filing the issue! I found another place where I was importing all of `lodash` and removed it. Can you try again with version `1.2.5`? Here's what I'm...

I don't think this should be default behavior (even in dev mode) because it'll have a big performance impact. We'd be computing styles for every Layout component on every render.