burtenshaw

@nataliaElv The use case is clear. **Server side** @jfcalvo @frascuchon It seems like the user endpoints have not been carried over to `v1` and most user operations are still in...

DSPy might not make sense as purely a Step because DSPy uses a lot of custom integration with llm's from various providers/ platforms/ frameworks, that would need to be replicated...

# Minimal Proposal In the first instance, distilabel could benefit from DSPy by using advanced prompting strategies like 'chain of thought' to generate synthetic samples. There are many more possible...

Example of DSPy saved optimised prompt: ```json { "prog": { "lm": null, "traces": [], "train": [], "demos": [ { "augmented": true, "question": "Barry has $10.00 worth of dimes. His little...

Thanks for the proposal @MoritzLaurer . Out of interest, could 0 be communicated by a None answer in a `required=False` rating question? The advantage would be that it saves your...

Thanks for the clarification @MoritzLaurer I agree that it makes sense for the annotator to specify 0 and that because it is 'cumulative' it should be a `RatingQuestion' and not...