Yves Delley

Btw, I have an [open PR](#1349) to enable *parsing* of offset units from strings, and that one only allows the form without the multiplication.

I am all in favour of removing/disallowing multiplication of offset units under any circumstance. However, I'm not sure I understand what exactly you are suggesting here. It is currently already...

While there seem to be some arguments against a split `Quantity`, there might be one in favour of it, related to `__array__` and it's warnings. IMHO, for a units package,...

I on the other hand would expect `m_as` to behave as @lovasoa does: IMHO `q.m_as(p) == (q/p).m_as("")` should hold, if it executes at all. There is a good reason for...

As it is not documented, there is no definite "intended" behaviour. If at all, then it would be up to @hgrecco to decide. Even then, in the interest of continuous...

It is only a flame war, if we're pitting opinions against each other, rather than objective arguments. I was trying to make clear that there are objective arguments why I...

It seems that `(a/b).m_as("dimensionless")` is probably the best we have today - though I would still prefer to have an API that has a documented, guaranteed physical meaning - which...

What I mean by non-physical is that neither the magnitude nor the unit are a property of a physical quantity (given a steel rod, you can measure its *length* but...

... and time passed quickly some more. I may have some time to work on this in the next few days and weeks. However, given the current focus on V2,...

It seems that #386 is still unsolved. At our company, we have been using a fork of pint for the past two years to get faster access to some fixes...