William Bezuidenhout

Hey! Sure thing. I'll start tomorrow. I have been trying to trace through the code to see where the issue occurs. I'll be happy to share my findings, don't know...

See below for the stored procedure which recreates the issue. Interestingly enough, the same error occurs if you return multiple result sets from the stored procedure. As far as I...

> I see some remaining occurence of `ADDITIONAL_PROD_REGISTRY`: > >  Updated. The `push_all` script can already handle multple registries so just updated the env...

> Issue on https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/pull/62269/files#diff-08b887c877bc36e59a90a823b4211912dd155bd0c083a033352c0cd94f443137R81 but @burmudar is on it. > > Pre-approving as I'll afk for an hour and it's an easily testable fix. Testing script ```bash #!/usr/bin/env bash ADDITIONAL_PROD_REGISTRIES="index.docker.io...

Discussed with @jhchabran and we settled on the following: * Github supports a `.github` repo in the organization where one can put default README, actions and other repo settings that...

Can't remove this at least until we have done another 2 releases with aspect due to backcompat tests

> @willdollman Do you perhaps remember the context on why these tests were flaking? They passed in CI now. Do you think its safe to enable them again? @indradhanush Here...

Merging this @indradhanush

Sure. Let the world see my _dirty laundry_ 😝 All my hacks can be found on `wb/unskip-bb`

Additional PR's: * https://github.com/sourcegraph/deploy-sourcegraph-cloud/pull/17321 * https://github.com/sourcegraph/deploy-sourcegraph-cloud/pull/17322