Flynn Bundy

Hi @yawn Indeed this is an area we could expand on, I think an SCP here that ships as part of ADF itself that handles locking down removal or alteration...

Thanks @yawn - @thomasmcgannon + @kalleeh what are your thoughts on this? I'd like to get this into the 3.1 release with your guidance.

Hi @thiezn Thanks for the suggestion, it makes sense for certain situations and is pretty straight forward to implement. I'll tag this one for work after 1.3.0 as we're working...

Thanks for opening the issue, I think there is something we can do further to make this more modularized for sure. Im going to have a think/discussion about this one...

Hi @thiezn This could be possible, and could potentially help users scope large amounts of targets within a single stage. I also agree with the optional control of this feature....

Gotcha, I think there is value in having some clever way of handling OU's with 100+ accounts in them *(eg sandbox)* - At the moment I think having sandbox type...

Hi @Vittoriusly Could you please elaborate on this a little bit more? Is there something in the current implementation that you feel is a large administrative overhead? If you were...

@triha74 can clarify further on how these two can integrate and will update the docs to include a section on this.

Thanks @EdoBarroso - The Account creation process in ADF will not execute if there are no .yml files within the *adf-accounts* directory. This is essentially the on/off functionality. It would...

Hi @WillBroadbentMSM This is something we have wanted to do for a while however it is a bit tricky to implement correctly at this stage. Partially because there is no...