Bumblefudge
Bumblefudge
In the interest of moving 25 to `Review`, we might delegate/punt this to the #170 CAIP and wait for interested parties to harmonize session management there, if everyone is happy...
At last RPC call, we got #171 to a good place and left some notes on how to continue iterating #170. Leaving this issue open for tracking if 25 gets...
merging further updates to CAIP-25 today, but still no progress on CAIP-170, so [removing the CAIP-170 constraint](https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/pull/217/commits/0de8414b5f4d5b9708fc447f6a76427fe93d4977) for now. Leaving this issue open in case session design makes quick progress,...
we should close #235 with this PR too (he says as if he's going to help)
PRs welcome?
"Just ignore" is always a dicey way of specifying behavior; perhaps the best solution is an extension spec that specifies exactly how to ignore or override CAIP122 behavior if X...
See also: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5219 (another possible `resource_namespace` if assets were generalized to resources...)
paging doctor @haardikk21 cleanup on aisle editorial
For context see https://github.com/ethcatherders/EIPIP issue 320
There isn't a ton of precedent for opening PRs on eip155/caipX.md files, so i'm happy to help on github or in DM/backchannel, @GriffGreen ! I like the basic idea and...