Bumblefudge
Bumblefudge
> Looks good to me, just wondering if you want to include the changes just added to [5792](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/9601/files) oh man it never ends! does [this](https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/namespaces/pull/139/commits/b43ffb58ff3b428d0f9215237369f0ce74b1f9e2) work? it's a little far-fetched...
Approved out-of-band by @obstropolos
> 2. For address, we specify `alephium:${network_id}:${address}`. Because `address` already have the group information implicitly we don't need to specify it. Actually, I would argue it's still worth encoding group...
I think this closes #294 ?
i think we're good to merge with any WG participant approving
haha, I just read these out of order and suggesting the inverse. Whatever the case, I feel like merging both into one PR (whether that PR adds 1 doc or...
> I think this closes #294 ? @pedrouid ? approve-and-merge?
I'm thinking maybe this should be "Draft PR" until most of those TODOs get filled out? Interesting stuff, overall...
bump @chris13524 is this back-burner or abandoned?
A.) I can't rebase/merge-conflict, B.) the archive this points to was archived/read-onlyèd last year.