Bumblefudge
Bumblefudge
March 2023 was a LONG TIME ago, but guessing from my habitually murky syntax, I probably meant if 1/3 or 3/5 or 2/4 or 1/5 resign and leave an even...
i'm not too attached to any version of the change, but if it feels important I'd recommend digging up the SC recording rather than trusting my swiss-cheese memory (this would've...
just one more week! (kidding!)
@decentralized-identity/TSC input welcome!
hey doods where was this statement added? it would be good to link to a central section of one doc (which can be expanded or updated over time) from other...
@sakurann is this answered-enough for now? We can reconsider after VCWG 2.0 institutes something formerly known as holder-binding anyways...
`is_holder` might also be worth moving to a `reserved terms` holding pen until there are more concrete implementations to define interop between...
Discussed on today's call. We assume you mean [this kind of key binding](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-05.html#name-optional-key-binding) from the SD-JWT spec? Are there other claim formats that have an equivalent? We have been waiting...
Discussed on today's call, not sure we can think through this and add a Field Constraint prop that satisfactorily accomplishes this for non-LD use-cases quickly enough for v2.0. Any chance...
Also, any additional help with the `@` escape issue definitely welcome from JSONPath wizards