Bumblefudge

Existing Tezos namespace definitions are here: * https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/namespaces/tree/main/tezos Guide for adding namespace definitions is here: * https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/master/CAIPs/caip-104.md And template for CAIP-specific namespace definitions is here: * https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/namespaces/blob/main/template/caipX.md Feel free to...

Hey @Narsiss -- checking back in because since we last chatted an Antelope namespace was added, which might make it easier to provide some context or explanation-by-contradistinction: https://namespaces.chainagnostic.org/antelope/caip2 Let me...

@narsiss any objection to closing this as stale?

## CAIP-2: Wownero and future forks would ideally be included in the namespace, unless it's a drastically different ~VM~ **Set of shared assumptions about chain integrity, node RPC definitions, and...

Hehe, you're right to point out the pro-smart-contract bias in my EVM mental model, of course each namespace doesn't map to a shared "VM"! I guess it would be a...

I would say that Monero seems to me to be a namespace *apart* from BTC, in that there isn't a 1:1 relationship between monero chains and BTC/bip122 chains, or a...

I would also note that CAIP2s, CAIP10s, CAIP19s, and various others are best conceived of as *export formats* or *translations* of native addressing and identity schemes for the benefit of...

i mean, on a quick search, it seems that for encoding and decoding things the base256 way, there is: - a [C library](https://github.com/Equim-chan/libb256) - some [C++ sample code](https://github.com/fleschutz/base256unicode) - a...

> Does this mean that CAIP-10 identifiers are supposed to be used internally by the application, but not displayed to a user? I thought it SHOULD be displayed to the...

^ NB @haardikk21 @ukstv @oed @obstropolos