B2G Bot

Comment Author: @guerojeff All this being said, I feel confident with the idea of replacing number of speakers with "countries where spoken." This would be useful information for us to...

Comment Author: @zbraniecki > It is not a single CLDR error. It's virtually all off. I'm sorry, but this is an opinion, not data. I asked for data.

Comment Author: @akerbeltz I know what the German dialect map looks like. The map represents maximum geographical spread, NOT speaker density. According to that map, all of Munich speaks Bavarian...

Comment Author: @zbraniecki I agree with :guerojeff.

Comment Author: @mathjazz Created attachment 8868781 a-fullpage.png I agree there's a value in having the "countries where spoken" information available for each locale. We should spin that off as a...

Comment Author: @Pike I find that data hard to digest, and tedious to read. Like, 50-100 thousand and 50-100 million are almost the same. Maybe there's a way to color-code...

Comment Author: @mathjazz (In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #10) > I find that data hard to digest, and tedious to read. Like, 50-100 thousand > and 50-100...

Comment Author: @mathjazz Created attachment 8868785 Numbers only Slightly updated proposal, using numbers instead of words. 1-5 million vs. 1 - 5.000.000 > [Attached file: b-fullpage.png (image/png, 603504 bytes)](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8868785) >...

Comment Author: @akerbeltz That's a lot of zeroes to take in ;) How about we just use m (million) and k (thousand) so you'd get 1-5m 5-10m 0.5-1k It would...

Comment Author: Paul Rausch <> Why not just use the ethnologue data for number of speakers? That's what UNESCO, Wikipedia etc use. Focusing on literate speakers is highly discriminatory against...