Kasia Łukasiewicz

Hi @semuelle, sorry, I should have probably written an update here - we've been trying to contact Parity to confirm the ideas behind this proposal with their devs, as suggested...

I'm coming back with an update - we sent the description of our approach along with some questions to the Parity developers and should receive their answers after 7th November....

@alxs @Noc2 Yes, indeed we are still waiting for the feedback from Parity devs. I will ping them once again. As soon as we get their opinion and adjust the...

Hi @alxs can I ask you to reopen this PR please? We're ready to follow with the solution that was discussed with Parity developers.

Thank you @Noc2! The original proposal has been updated based on the feedback we got in late November 2022 from the Parity developers team.

Ah, yes, sorry @Noc2. I updated the file

The cost stems from the fact that we wanted to include in calculations the period when we were redoing and discussing the solutions in the autumn while checking with Parity....

Thank you @takahser for the review and suggestions

Just to check, is there anything else we should improve or add at this stage @Noc2 ? Are our answers sufficient or maybe we should add more information @takahser?