Vojtěch Bubník
Most likely not in this version. We have to evaluate its usefulness first.
I don't think that this pull request fixes #3814 . Those are two independent topics. I see some sense in what you have done, however I would rather have the...
Sorry it did not make it into 2.4. We need to roll out 2.4. We should look into the pull request after the 2.4 release. I agree that for dense...
> The filament profile is still not compatible, since (I assume - I didn't check the code), the base profile/s are still checked for compatibility when computing the final profile....
> Mhh I'm not sure I follow. The profile on disk just contains the condition... The way I understand you is that you have a profile that you edit, but...
The profiles you derived from Prusa3D system profiles are considered to be part of the space of the Prusa3D vendor, therefore they are not compatible with non-Prusa3D printer profile. You...
> This forces me to make copies of material and print profiles which are identical in their nature. We believe that there will be slight adjustments for the material profiles...
> Making tweaks to an existing profile and saving it is also what most users do (I bet nobody is starting a print profile from scratch), which compounds to the...
The decision to make the print and filament profiles locked to the vendor space of the printer was made to separate the responsibilities of us (Prusa3D) from the 3rd party...