btolsch

Results 7 comments of btolsch

The following issues are some that come to mind on this topic: - W.r.t. the QUIC spec, the PING frame in QUIC is specifically for keeping both the QUIC connection...

Refactoring for consistency is fine with me. I wasn't aware of the `cpuid` program on Linux, but I guess still including tlb-info could be useful on Windows, unless CPU-Z or...

I tried your branch vs. mine and with `perf stat` they behave almost identically (within normal run-to-run deviations) in all the examples I gave in the README.md. What results were...

The results I get comparing the two branches mostly differ in cache miss counts, but otherwise, yes I still get a jump in L2 TLB misses going from `8 128`,...

That's definitely even weirder. I didn't have a reason for choosing `MAP_SHARED`, but there should be no difference between these since there's no multithreading or IPC happening. I'm also not...

Is your branch behaving like mine with `MAP_PRIVATE` or `MAP_SHARED`? I still have absolutely no idea why the TLB misses would be different, but yours should behave like `MAP_PRIVATE` (since...

I'm only surprised by the 128 offset results; 16,128 and 24,128 should cause increased misses. The other thing I don't understand though, (and maybe it's not important) is what is...