Bruno Schaatsbergen

Do what fits you and think is best and easiest to maintain on long term. Incase the whole section is outdated, replace it or just re-format it properly. Thanks for...

I was facing the same issue: _Response: {'ok': False, 'error': 'missing_scope', 'needed': 'chat:write:bot', 'provided': 'incoming-webhook,calls:write'}_ After some digging on community forums, It seems like _"chat:write:bot"_ is not accessible from the...

> Any updates on this? It's WIP at the moment. I'm trying to get it done in the coming few days.

Hi @scottwestover, thanks for taking the time to raise this PR. Please note that as per the docs [here](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-rule-statement-oversize-handling.html), Oversize Handling applies to more places in the WAFv2 Webl ACL;...

> @bschaatsbergen Yes, it does apply to the other `FieldToMatch` types, however most of those types do not appear to be supported currently in the provider: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws/latest/docs/resources/wafv2_web_acl#field-to-match. > > My...

Hi @scottwestover, great work. I've addressed it with one of the core team members and they will take a look at this.

I'm going to wait for some feedback on this PR, whether it fits the roadmap, etc. before finalizing this.

> @bschaatsbergen I don't know how long you are planning on waiting, but you might want to set the PR to 'Ready for review' to get it reviewed by one...

@melinath, I would like to pick this up but we should first agree on the implementation. As you've stated - it seems like this doesn't directly map to an API...

@gdavison, looking at https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/commit/226cd4f55e572f733d8790484d8d79ba72c4ba92, was there any specific reason to remove this?