bryngemark

thanks all for your patience, I think I was a little sloppy -- I understand and am aware that it _is_ included, I was mostly wondering why it was considered...

Thanks for bringing this up @tomeichlersmith. I'll add to the list of curious/unwanted behaviors that I have never been able to drop Ecal simhits, explicitly or by wildcarding on simhits...

Mmm yeah, this mixing of local and container variables actually makes me a little uneasy. Not just that it's a time sink to confuse them but also that it messes...

Let's discuss this in a sw dev meeting so I understand the interplay of your suggestion with requiring that sites set up `cvmfs` and that paths are loaded etc.

Great, looks good to me. Before we went container, and compiling outside slac was a mess, there were some thoughts in (CERN accustomed) Lund about using cvmfs for distributing our...

@jpasc27 if you have an idea of where to start making these changes, and are willing to have a go, please feel free to pick this one up! If not,...

@jpasc27 would you be willing to take on making the modifications to filters you made "on the fly" in your [ecalPN config ](https://github.com/LDMX-Software/LDCS/blob/main/exampleConfigs/ldmxjob_ecalPN.py), but in the configs of each filter/biasing...

I believe the general idea is that we are moving to 8 GeV as default. So I suggest we update to 550 since a) we can lower to 450 on...

did we settle on if we wanted to apply formatting at the end of successful CI tests in a PR? and do we in that case need to check building/rerun...

hi @joyang8caltech, welcome to github :) What would be the reason to not modify the energy deposited? The way we process simhits further down the reconstruction chain (see [here](https://github.com/LDMX-Software/TrigScint/blob/d7d2b3a99488cc3c5ac52b82084429e37f0b2956/src/TrigScint/TrigScintQIEDigiProducer.cxx#L98-L115)) uses...