Bruno Silva

Results 51 comments of Bruno Silva

> Well, the ctgt is increasing as it should . The residuals are overfitting, I would not worry about those. Also, nig 5 or 10 is too much. For angles...

### Update on this : > I will run a batch with -ftol 1e-4 -xtol 1e-4 -gtol 1e-4 , 1 run stratified shuffle split 70/30 1 split with : I...

What do you mean weights and biases? I didn't get it. Attribute a "weight" (more like a id the way im thinking) to each related experience and relate them after...

I'm going back on my previous take. Other than breaking backwards compatibility, the way the plots would be generated would be fixed. After discussing with @manuelgitgomes, I settled on saving...

Now each batch has this both in results and results processed : ![image](https://github.com/lardemua/atom/assets/31831043/3cb9aa9b-ac23-4afb-b027-7501d5bcf54c) Meaning now a new script will read off of a yaml a set of conditions and plot...

> as @lucasrdalcol to show you what it can do. I will mention it whenever I seem him next week :) # Plot graphs script This is the new fully...

Possibly migrate to seaborn. Could move the plotting to a separate function and give the user the option to choose between seaborn/matplotlib. Great feature but due to lack of time...

Seems to be "fixed". What was happening is that `glob.glob(args['results_folder'] + '/' + experiment + '*')` with the `nig_0.15-ntfv_0.1` experiment was also grepping the `nig_0.15-ntfv_0.15`. Adding a "_" should fixed...

That or a way more complicated filtering mechanism, considering now the experience settings are also on a yaml file for each folder, which is more bulletproof than having the settings...

Meanwhile I found another hiccup. I have 3 truly horrendous collections in my dataset. I don't wan't them anywhere. They weren't being excluded before. I added this to the batch...