Brian Stock

RStudio can have problems with graphics. Have you tried running outside RStudio? On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 7:27 PM DSchimmenti ***@***.***> wrote: > I am having the same issue using...

Hi Gary, 20 sources is a LOT... mixing models typically can't resolve more than 5-7, even if you have several tracers. Can you describe the nature of your data? What...

See replies in other issues and this vignette: http://brianstock.github.io/MixSIAR/articles/modify_output.html $BUGSoutput$sims.list$ has the mcmc draws so you can calculate whatever summary stat you want On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, 4:03 AM...

Are you comparing the same summary statistics with the figure? The peak is the mode, not the mean or median which are reported in the summary stats. On Mon, Jun...

That looks like a warning and not an error. Is there a problem with the plot? You'd need to give more information - post a minimal example (data and code).

I can't help unless you post a minimal reproducible example: https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example. On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 5:35 PM Wieteke Holthuijzen ***@***.***> wrote: > To give more context, I am running...

Sorry, I don't know why. I get those warnings about scale already present, but the plots also come out fine as in the manual ``` > plot_intervals(combined,toplot="fac1") Scale for 'y'...

Hi, Argh, sorry... yes that would be a good feature to add, but no, it's not built in. I agree if you've got good stomach content data (especially with different...

Check out the killer whale example in the manual - whole numbers, and the sum determines the "informativeness" of the prior. Also see [Figure 3](https://peerj.com/articles/5096/#fig-3) in the PeerJ paper.

Hi Adriana, That seems reasonable. It probably won't make a big difference from the generalist/uninformative prior because the sum of the alpha is the same and 20% is close to...