Brandon seydel

Any news on this?

I may put a PR for this since.

> What we could consider further, is to apply the same shorthand for normal bindings as well: > > ``` > > ``` > > Is it good to enable:...

> The shadow-dom is in options of `@customElement`. Why we need another decorator? > The deco already exists just no way to specify stylessheets or dependencies unless you fully deco...

> When not using explicit `@customElement`, you can use `` in html template. > We have a deco for this but no way for stylesheets to be used conventionally without...

> I understand there is some difficult for user to manually control shadow-dom because the special setup in webpack config. We probably can recommend some naming conventions for css file...

@bigopon what you think it should be named? I think we can drop bind since these will all have to be an obj....cut the fat bindables="{}" properties="{}" observables="{}" ...="{}"

@thomas-darling - Check out this .net core console app it does something close to what you are suggesting for scaffolding. https://github.com/aurelia/dotnet/blob/master/Aurelia.RouteGenerator/Program.cs

@bigopon - The behavior should be the same as if it is not even there. Say crudely a regex replace all with empty string.

@bigopon - only bindables unless there is a @bindable({type:Object}) maybe?