bradgrantham-lunarg

Is reproducing this as simple as "XR_ENABLE_API_LAYERS=XR_APILAYER_LUNARG_core_validation;XR_APILAYER_LUNARG_core_validation"? It's not clear from https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenXR-SDK-Source/pull/155 what precipitates the issue. It's conceivable that someone could do, e.g. "XR_ENABLE_API_LAYERS=XR_APILAYER_LUNARG_api_dump;SOME_WEIRD_LAYER;XR_APILAYER_LUNARG_api_dump" (i.e. layer enabled twice _on purpose_...

Yeah, I'm not sure it is a valid use case after thinking about it. They both read the same environment variable for the type and destination of the output -...

Layers appear to be enabled in the order they are discovered in manifests. That is to say, if there are no implicit layers, and then `XR_API_LAYER_PATH=location-of-layer-B-manifest;location-of-layer-A-manifest` and `XR_ENABLE_API_LAYERS=layer-A;layer-B`, layerB is...

An issue (number 1531) has been filed in the internal Khronos GitLab, to correspond to the new issue relating to order of API layer load and initialization. If you have...