boxdot

> Sorry for the delayed response on this! > > Is there a spec for gRPC over WS? Beyond gRPC web? I don't think so. The idea was just to...

Sure. Would it be possible to expose the parts of transport that are wasm32 compatible under a feature flag? At least this would allow to use the client in wasm....

I did some work to rebase the branches on top of tokio 1.0 and the latest release of tonic. There is no need for tower's `buffer` patch anymore, since it...

@LucioFranco Yes, it makes sense to start with `h2`, since it is a tiny patch. We just need to figure out how to make it least intrusive. I will pick...

> Changes for this have been upstreamed to hyper and h2. How should the discussion proceed to make this a reality in tonic? I will upgrade my repository and integrate...

`h2` got an option to configure the max concurrent reset streams. The non-wasm compatible `Instant::now` is now only used when it is configured to be `> 0`. More details here:...

I ported my patch to the latest master of tonic: https://github.com/boxdot/tonic/commit/1da79d033b50ab08495ccbdfe287278a6192921e. It adds a feature flag to tonic which disables all wasm non-compatible parts of transports and enables compilation of...

It got stale. I will rebase this PR on branch 0.6.

Yes, I mean Python tests.

As far as I understand, the python implementation is fully functional. I think we should make this issue more precise. E.g. by specifying what performance problems you see right now....