Harry Stern

I am also unable to use absolute imports when attempting to run benches with `python -m` with the following directory structure: ``` mypkg/ mypkg/__init__.py mypkg/myfunc.py mypkg/bench/ mypkg/bench/bench_myfunc.py ``` The contents...

Thanks for the tip on using the run-types = Examples in a config file! Let me know if there's anything I can do to help with understanding the weird behavior...

https://github.com/boustrophedon/tarpaulin_missing_coverage/runs/5400464385 Here's what I'm getting when using the issue/process-kill-953 branch ``` running 1 test test call_main ... running 1 test test call_main ... ok test result: ok. 1 passed; 0...

Oh, I should change the code to remove the test harness and see if that does anything though.

nope, same failure https://github.com/boustrophedon/tarpaulin_missing_coverage/runs/5400595536

 https://github.com/boustrophedon/tarpaulin_missing_coverage/runs/5415282826?check_suite_focus=true It worked! Thanks so much for fixing this!

Awesome. Should I close this issue or do you want to do it when you do the release?

I'm getting segfaults when I upgrade to 0.2 :( https://github.com/boustrophedon/extrasafe/runs/5638757347 but the minimal example builds and runs: https://github.com/boustrophedon/tarpaulin_missing_coverage/actions/runs/2020270268 https://coveralls.io/github/boustrophedon/tarpaulin_missing_coverage

It's just calling `cargo tarpaulin`: https://github.com/boustrophedon/extrasafe/blob/ipc_coverage-rebase/.github/workflows/build-test.yaml#L60 I wonder if the examples are also being run with the equivalent of test-threads 1? https://github.com/boustrophedon/extrasafe/blob/ipc_coverage-rebase/.tarpaulin.toml#L3

Actually it looks like this failure is probably on my side. Out of curiosity, is tarpaulin using signals in some way to catch syscalls or something?