pfr
pfr copied to clipboard
boostorg
std::tuple like methods for user defined types without any macro or boilerplate code
How about this sugar? ``` struct sample { int first; const char* second; double third; }; auto t = sample {1, "Foo", 3.14}; // index-based access std::cout
Clang-tidy 12 is complaining: ``` /home/runner/work/cherry_blazer/cherry_blazer/_deps/boost_pfr-src/include/boost/pfr/detail/sequence_tuple.hpp:53:5: warning: Undefined or garbage value returned to caller [clang-analyzer-core.uninitialized.UndefReturn] return t.value; ^ /home/runner/work/cherry_blazer/cherry_blazer/src/canvas.cc:126:37: note: Assuming 'nth_batch' is < 'batch_count' for (std::size_t nth_batch = 0;...
I don't know if this is a bug or feature, but `BOOST_PFR_FUNCTIONS_FOR` requires structure members to have an `std::hash` specialization, but it doesn't itself provide one, so the following example...
This macro will help me embed boost.pfr into boost.fusion without breaking backward compatibility. Without this macro, I am forced to provide backward compatibility with a dirty hack like: https://github.com/denzor200/fusion/blob/e9d7fcdcd8de4e66bff5427726d777c222e7590d/include/boost/fusion/support/config.hpp#L136
Multiple visitation is easy enough to achieve with a library like Boost.Hana (see below), but I think it would be useful functionality for ```for_each_field``` to support directly. ```cpp template constexpr...
Sometimes it is convenient to have a freestanding version of the library, that does not mention boost. Make a script that produces such version
Hi, I thought of using the magic of this library as a shortcut for providing a standard "tuple-like" interface for aggregates, for use in generic code that expects it, in...
Provided the following hierarchy of classes: ```C++ namespace empty_base { struct A {}; struct B {}; // Empty base, no members struct C : A {}; // Empty base, some...
