boonwj

Sorry, I forgot to follow up on this. I will work on it over the next few days.

Oh I see what you mean. I misunderstood the intention of the feature. In the above mentioned order of execution, the program's behavior may be inconsistent with what the user...

I realised that this functionality in its current form would not be very useful. Since any future conflicting command will still break a user's existing workflow (i.e. running 1build's command...

Yeah lets go ahead with that. I will work on it over the next few days.

Perhaps this could be controlled via a field, e.g. `execute_after_on_failure: false`. The user can then have a choice on their preferred behaviour.