Bob Carpenter

Unless there's a reason I'm missing for making this change, I'll close this issue on the next cleanup pass.

Thanks. Concrete examples help a lot. As the parser's currently written, it's not technically an ambiguity insofar as the parser is greedy left-to-right, so the "." goes with the "1"...

The warning is a very good idea! We'd start there by deprecating the feature anyway. So we should at least do that. Thanks again for commenting. We really do appreciate...

We're going to be reorganizing this into demo models with data to run. But whatever works now should work into the future. - Bob > On May 23, 2016, at...

That's great. > On May 23, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Felix Leung [email protected] wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. I wrote a little script that takes a directory...

I'm happy to take this one on if @breckbaldwin thinks it's a good idea. @bgoodri in the past has said that CRAN's a fine resource for finding things that depend...

I only want to list ones we can vouch for, like Prophet and brms and rethinking.

I'm not proposing a heavy process---I'm OK with anything any of the devs think should be added. We're not supplying guarantees, just links.

Good point. But I don't like tables of contents. It seems to be trying to put a band aid on a problem that's more structural. What if the pages are...

@jgabry on the mailing list suggested that we not have deep nesting on a page like on the current citations and docs pages (where you have to scroll down to...