Brandon Williams

Somewhat related to no longer being able to use a custom `rustls::ClientConfig` we're also unable to use a custom `rustls:ServerConfig`. From @LucioFranco's most recent comment and looking at some of...

@AlbertSu123 I believe that @oxade is currently working on implementing this feature.

@gregnazario I'll ping some folks and see who owns it.

Just an FYI that i remember having a chat with @huitseeker about simplifying our lives a bit and merging all of these interfaces to be hosted off of a single...

We'd need to annotate each instance to get the behaviour that you want. Which is no different from requiring that you use this type instead of the stdlib type. At...

Thanks @joyqvq for resurrecting this. I think that before we look at getting this merged that we should revisit some parts of the intent scheme since I believe they should...

Specifically to TransactionData

We may end up needing to do something slightly different with ChainId (as this is something that we probably want to exist onchain in some capacity) but we can iterate...

> Additionally, this should make it possible to use a destroy-and-rebuild pattern for active processes, which is much simpler and less error-prone than the current approach of reconfiguring processes on...

It may still be worthwhile to introduce and include a network ID/chain id, inside of the system object. But you're correct that we probably don't need such a construct in...