bluekitedreamer

> @Shocktrooper Shouldn't these just be uninstalled then so that there aren't false positives? The container is based upon another project the maintainer has ongoing. https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/docker-nginx-full Base container appears to...

> It would be great to have a version with alpine as the base image Agreed, that's basically the go to image for thin/minimal. There are a few better options...

@ISnotes Found this upon further review https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/docker-nginx-full/issues/9#issuecomment-1286249396 Apparently this originated on Alpine at one point. Sidw note, the image building process isnt as complex as I first thought which is...

https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/1011

Some of the history jc21 was mentioning in the discussion I posted a few comments back https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/1141#issuecomment-870243651

I'm interested in getting some updated feedback from @jc21 on that comment, I wouldn't mind undertaking the effort of getting this back to a more secure image if I know...

Gotcha, you're shooting for maximum comptability all around here, makes sense, I like it. I'd normally be the advocate of lets just change the OS limitation, but as an app...

Also I had the version wrong I'm using 3.1 not 3.0.1, I fixed it above

> But both points are gonna be solved with v3 mostly. So the Future is looking great! I don't think jc21 needs to waste his time here, as he is...

Possibly a simple issue to fix, see another issue recently filed here with solution suggestion (https://github.com/ciur/papermerge/issues/614#issue-2255198217).