Jonathon Anderson

@scottwittenburg @becker33 Does this seem like a reasonable change to the `gitlab-ci` semantics? The combinatorics needed for the configuration space we want to target is really becoming a problem for...

@becker33 The environments currently in `share/spack/gitlab/cloud_pipelines` only support a single OS/arch triple at a time. They don't use combinatorics and thus don't reap any benefits from this patch. The benefits...

Rebased, and simplified logic in `_remove_attributes`. No other changes.

I'm not sure why the `codecov/patch` check is failing, clicking through "details" gives it a 91.67% diff coverage.

@scheibelp This is the updated version based on our discussion at the meeting today. I added a new `gitlab-ci:match_behavior` key that determines whether only the first match is applied (`first`,...

@hainest Chiming in with my 2¢: `boost::multi_index_container` is a *massive* general data structure (it's like an in-memory relational database). Given the performance/general applicability/maintainability tradeoff, I have serious doubts it will...

@hainest > > I have serious doubts it will be feasible to find/implement a "proper" concurrent equivalent without sacrificing the performance. > > Very much agree. When I said `we...

This fixes #31952 unless the Spack instance is not a Git repository, in which case it's the bare Spack version (e.g. `0.19.0.dev0`). Would it be possible to move this `git...

I'm also experiencing this issue, it seems Buildah 1.32.0 does not have this issue while 1.32.2 does. Which would point to #5083 being the cause of this regression. Command to...

+1, still experiencing this error on: * **Spack:** 0.22.0.dev0 (b1ab01280af1ec3065594b739dc2bde3f2107510) * **Python:** 3.10.12 * **Platform:** linux-ubuntu22.04-zen2 * **Concretizer:** clingo Minimal reproducer: ```console $ spack install [email protected]=2.1.5 -opt $ spack spec...