Markus Blatt
Markus Blatt
Can we actually anticipate this? If there is an ACTIONX manipulating wells, it seems that we cannot as it will get executed later and change the rest of the schedule....
Looks good. Regarding your comment: "There has to be a better way". Yes, I think detecting where is inactive wells end up distributed, might be accomplished in CpGrid::loadBalance. We would...
@vkip, I think you might need to rebase the companion PR in opm-common onto current master like this one. As it is currently this one needs opm-common 2025.04 but the...
jenkins build this opm-common=4198 serial please
Perfect,thanks a lot for the changes and the nice improvement.
A clear bug fix that should be in the release
I think we should add a comment about ACTUM (what cells are inactive) to the top comments in that file. E.g. "this test based on test ..., but we deactivated...
On the other hand, I am not sure whether it makes sense to have this test here. It has an injector well in the first cell and a producer in...
FYI the test for INCLUDE in ACTIONX is from 2021 and our [notes](https://github.com/OPM/opm-tests/blob/eba6e30e509408e0296e56a5630c61cdb112d156/actionx/ACTIONX.md) mark it as supported since at least 2 years...
Thanks a lot. I have created a PR replacing this one. That PR works around the problem by allowing all wells to be distributed. The problem was that with PYACTION...