Emmanuel Garcia
Emmanuel Garcia
You can already achieve this if you use the app-layout elements. https://github.com/PolymerLabs/app-layout although we don't have formally have a`app-footer` yet. Should there be one? @frankiefu ?
That's true. We should either remove that from the docs or add that behavior back to the element. PR welcome.
I don't think so. It sounds like you need to create two elements e.g (x-internal and x-public) and share some common functionality among the two. In that way, you can...
I just saw it. Yeah, that seems to be only one of a few styling issues in shadow DOM. Thanks for pointing out.
@BLamy there are plans to rewrite this element to enhance its core functionalities, but I'm not sure why roadmap, planning & testing should be put in there.
@valdrinkoshi I think that this is a very special case. I'd ping @garlicnation to see if there's a way to show the docs. I think this is a limitation because...
friendly ping @garlicnation
Yes, it's the same issue. In this case, `iron-swipeable-container` removes the element from the light DOM. https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-swipeable-container/blob/master/iron-swipeable-container.html#L257 Because the DOM was removed dynamically, those nodes can't be recycled, but iron-list...
@RonnChyran the priorities :)