Borahm Lee

@artembilan @garyrussell Hello, I've found that the current behavior can occur when using multiple listeners with different group IDs in the same class. > Current Behavior - described above >...

@garyrussell > I am no longer involved with the project Oh I didn't know that! Thanks for your comment!! 🙇 > Each listener method is invoked by a different listener...

> @bky373 Thanks for reporting. As @garyrussell pointed out, this looks like it is non-thread-state related, but it looks like some bug (Thanks, Gary, for chiming in!! :) ). We...

@sobychacko @garyrussell Thanks for your comments! As you mentioned, the method listeners within the class will apply the callback identically regardless of consumer group ID. So it seems necessary to...

@sobychacko Thank you for taking the time to research and respond! I'm curious to know what you think of the solution. - Are you considering adding a new parameter (e.g.,...

@sobychacko Yes, thank you! Personally, I'd like to take this on and work on it a bit more. However, before I start working on the code, it would be great...

@sobychacko Hi, I apologize for reaching out after such a long time. I've revisited the issue and thought about potential solutions. Before diving into the details, let me briefly summarize...

@sobychacko Hi, if you have some time, could I get your feedback on the above? I would like to know what you have in mind. If a different approach is...

@sobychacko Thanks for your reply! > Also, I wonder if there is a valid use case that might benefit others where they need to drive seeking offsets based on the...

> Well, this new consumerSeekAllowed feels more like a workaround for what we cannot do right now. And it is a bit awkward: we do ConsumerSeekAware, but then consumerSeekAllowed =...