Björn Quentin

We should probably double check with code in esp-idf - if they don't have that and everything works without we probably can/should remove it

Not really sure I get what you are proposing. Mind expanding on that? Adopting the naming and format of the env-variable from env-logger and re-implementing it?

It's a known limitation that the async implementation won't handle sending more pulse codes than the buffer can take: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-hal/blob/5d6354ccbd62527452968074c4a92a4fc6c6a635/esp-hal/src/rmt.rs#L1173-L1175 https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-hal/blob/5d6354ccbd62527452968074c4a92a4fc6c6a635/esp-hal/src/rmt.rs#L1166-L1168 Refilling the buffer is very time critical - I'm...

Removed the "bug" label since it's working as documented. However, it's certainly a valid feature request

That would be a useful addition

We still don't support configuring `ble_acl_buf_size` but I had a brief look at the issue here The controller returns an error for HCI_Host_Buffer_Size if the requested `host_acl_data_packet_len` is less than...

Thanks for the clarification!

Currently we use the drivers/header from ESP-IDF commit c570f674610479fc5e070c8db6d181b73ddf60a8 - we update the drivers more or less regularly I guess the next update should happen in the first half of...

Thanks for looking into that. > First I copied the new headers into esp-wifi-sys from esp-idf. This was pretty straight forward, I just matched the filenames. That's certainly fine for...

Could you try with https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-hal/pull/1008 ? With the changes there I was able to see ``` esp-now version 1 Send Send broadcast status: Ok(()) Send Send broadcast status: Ok(()) Send...