Brice Jaglin

@olafurpg @adpi2 I'd be happy to get your opinion on that one

Good work on the investigation, I imagine it must have been painful... I haven't worked on this recently, but rather on stack trace suppression in sbt-scalafix: https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-scalafix/pull/306. * (3) looks...

I interpreted (3) as: keep the current behavior (`notOk`), but with an actionable error message pointing out the faulty element in the classpath.

FTR, here is the full stack trace ``` java.util.zip.ZipException: zip file is empty at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source.zerror(ZipFile.java:1607) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source.findEND(ZipFile.java:1410) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source.initCEN(ZipFile.java:1504) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source.(ZipFile.java:1308) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source.get(ZipFile.java:1271) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$CleanableResource.(ZipFile.java:733) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile$CleanableResource.get(ZipFile.java:850) at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:248) at...

Thanks! I'll confirm manually that https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/issues/962 can be closed when the next scalameta bump PR is opened.

I am really happy to get some feedback about sbt-scalafix which could get some UX love. Thanks for the initiative and for opening up a discussion about upstream it! I...

> `appendWithoutSession` is used instead of `appendWithSession`. Is there something that would prevent from using `appendWithSession`? I don't think so, feel free to open a PR!

Because of https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/5459, the suggested change might not be enough.

related discussion https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-scalafix/pull/292#discussion_r834283114

@tribbloid any chance we can get your conf? Thanks!