Brice Jaglin

Results 255 comments of Brice Jaglin

> I'm still not a fan of that approach because it's unorthodox I am concerned it would be confusing for users. Indeed, although technically it's a good workaround! Would it...

Yes I don't think there is a need for it to be a setting key. Regarding sbt 1.3.x: I know it's possible to declare a task key twice, so maybe...

I started looking into that for good and quickly faced another challenge: since `scalafix-cli` [is published with full cross version (one per binary version)](https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/commit/06b5605991cdb2ecff62745a1c6d1125407b2fb7), `scalafix-interfaces` needs to find that exact...

> I’m wondering, would this change no longer be necessary if we could automatically release sbt-Scalafix together with Scalafix-cli? Maybe it’s possible to merge the repos somehow I didn't go...

I tried to sum up the current constraints about Scala versions before embarking on [(3)](https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/issues/1146#issuecomment-723337034), and I could not find any (new) blocker. Please correct me if I got something...

~Writing this left me with an open question about `scalafix-rule_2.n` which depends on `semanticdb-scalac-core_2.n.m`: since [some external rules depend on it for `ScalafixGlobal`](https://github.com/scala/scala-rewrites/blob/e446c54f6efa12646823105cbf3a7c71786713f4/build.sbt#L24) and is [currently loaded in the same...

@mlachkar not really, this isn't related to `scalafix-interfaces`. Actually while trying to rephrase I realized there was no problem... An external rule depending on a `scalafix-rule_2.a` will bring in a...

I will try to find some time over the next few weeks to resume my work on this.

It has been a few weeks now 😅 so before getting back to that, I wanted to re-evaluate [(3)](https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/issues/1146#issuecomment-723337034) at the light of - [the removal of on-demand compilation when...

Thanks @olafurpg & @sjrd for pointing out the rationale behind full-version publishing! > I tried to catch up on the discussion but it's not clear to me what is the...