bips
bips copied to clipboard
bitcoin
Bitcoin Improvement Proposals
Reloading this PR with minimal, backward-compatible changes. * I believe there is consensus on the need to add a new champion [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1600#issuecomment-2394691135). * The reason for adding a new reference...
This spent several months gathering feedback from the mailing list and from other advisors. This is hopefully polished enough to submit upstream. Let me know if you have any questions...
This BIP adds support for sending silent payments using PSBTs. If there are multiple entities handling the PSBT that do not have access to some input private keys, a DLEQ...
These are required for legal use, and also per BIP-2, and they avoid user confusion as seen in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1395#issuecomment-2393915807. Choice of MIT license per BIP author feedback in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1395#issuecomment-2393930721. The...
Moving this BIP to final stage as this is widely deployed
I had written a [blog post](https://uncensoredtech.substack.com/p/octojoin) about the concept and it was shared on [mailing list](https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/aAJrGBf_oS4) in July 2024. There wasn't any response on mailing list but I have discussed...
* also widely deployed
This introducing a BIP for the unrequested transaction processing for the mechanism itself. This is building on top of `bip-txrelayv2` proposal. Bitcoin Core conceptual discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30572 Partially related ML post:...
If we find a better way to implement reject unrequested transactions in a backward compatible fashion, I’ll withdraw it. ML post: https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/nWUcXBQbLGU Bitcoin Core conceptual discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30572
Replaces the TODO in BIP-118 deployment section with a comprehensive deployment specification.
