John Biddiscombe

Any update on a 2.0 release date? Not much happening for months on github... I am interested in (can help with) improving charts etc if historical data becomes accessible.

OK. Thanks for the update. Should you need additional beta testers, I would be happy to test a branch for you ;)

I am running 3 localities on the same node as shown below, but each locality should bind to it's own core and PUs. What I see is that the processes...

Keeping this alive as a reminder to myself to look at it again

> Let me however add that I think the discussion cited above is inapproproate at best. For instance, what benefit would we have from replacing boost::program_options with some other external...

@K-ballo Thanks for compiling that list of #include files. It's a worryingly long one.

> If you're suggesting to add things to HPX so easily, why are you opposed to adding a simple thread-local allocator arguing about it being 'a shame to see the...

@sithhell wrote on IRC > We should just submodule the boost libs we need and include them in our build system. Then it looks like we're free of boost... And...

git submodules are a PITA but we currently use a slight variation for APEX with our cmake git_external/submodule script that hides some of the pain and that could be implemented...

> Additionally, the SLURM batch environment handling, some runtime parameter handling, and some examples depend on Spirit. Those uses are fairly simple and could be rewritten, however. Most of the...