Bharath Vedartham
Bharath Vedartham
Hello, I would love to take up the issue. I am a beginner in Open Source contribution. I ll study your project and work on the issue.
Is there a reason why this is not available in the current pytify versions? I saw that the pull request was closed but no reason was stated?
Right, I should have done this before. I think I may have misread #43 . It is an issue and not a PR! Sorry! But is there any good reason...
Hi @movekevin , wanted to understand the status of user stake delegations on aptos a bit more. As far as i understand apart from this PR, there is no way...
> > Hi @movekevin , wanted to understand the status of user stake delegations on aptos a bit more. As far as i understand apart from this PR, there is...
@mislav Can we change the intimation message until this is fixed? Something like `github.com token for :` rather than `github.com password for :` ? I think the message is fairly...
hey @nisdas would love to take this one. I believe this is a deneb change where we can remove the necessity of the beacon node, since the fork version is...
also on closer look, the voluntary exit signatures produced by the voluntary-exit command for deneb will be invalid in the current state as it picks up the fork version based...
I believe we might need the beacon chain rpc to fetch the latest beacon state for the GenesisValidatorRoot to compute the signing domain but dont think it has to be...