Ian Kilpatrick
Ian Kilpatrick
Are these tests asserting the new static-position behaviour (e.g. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#justify-abspos ) or the old static-position behaviour?
cc/ @tabatkins @fantasai
As a concrete example: ```html .containing-block { position: relative; } .abspos { position: absolute; align-self: start; justify-self: end; } ``` Should the two "abspos" go in the same direction? What...
> The align-self and justify-self properties initialize to auto, which for absolutely-positioned elements does not reference the container`. https://www.w3.org/TR/css-align-3/#valdef-justify-self-auto This isn't clear from the spec to me - can you...
> Hmmm - we have a larger issue here then. Currently align-items for both grid and flex (interoperably across all engines) affect the static position. I believed that we were...
This does have similar issue to #7542 in that all these form elements already have *some* algorithm for defining their min-content, and max-content sizes. E.g. its roughly interoperable if you...
David and I chatted quickly about this case today. @fantasai am I correct in assuming that your preferred behaviour here is: - The static-pos rectangle for an abspos is the...
@dholbert - That example is using the `min-width: auto` to size up to 100px, its not strictly that "min-content" is 100px in this case. E.g. ``` ``` In the above...
@dholbert - Given that clarification I think there is still a terminology issue here. E.g. ```html ``` > The flex item in question does not have a specified size suggestion,...