bever1337
bever1337
Old ticket but I want to confirm that @kjersten is absolutely correct. We had the experience of some developers using serverless-dynamodb-local without a hitch, but I couldn't connect locally and...
The CI looks grumpy, but it seems appropriate to fail deploys from unsolicited PRs. Please let me know if there are additional tests I can run to validate docs changes
I have an identical error to Jakub, but a different machine: ``` Darwin hostname.local 21.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 21.6.0: Mon Aug 22 20:17:10 PDT 2022; root:xnu-8020.140.49~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 ``` Updating through...
Here is a minimal reproduction: ``` # .env PGDATABASE=blahblahblah PGUSER=blahblahblah ``` ```json { "name": "example reproduction", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "", "main": "index.js", "scripts": { "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\"...
I use an approach like this in my applications: ```typescript type Recipe = (arg0: Draft) => void | MyState; ``` RTK-Query also annotates the 'recipe' approach: https://github.com/reduxjs/redux-toolkit/blob/2425f02fe68f7e186c21e009605022013778a2c5/packages/toolkit/src/query/core/buildThunks.ts#L156 Here is a...
In RxJS, an 'error' indicates that an observable has finished. The WebSocketSubject does not provide a stream for non-critical (application level) errors. Instead, all errors are escalated and treated like...
This issue does have a related bug: #5312
I don't believe there's any marble testing to be done since this work is making native features observable. In my experience, there is no equivalent framework like `msw` for mocking...
I need to research further, but I think the multiplexer can also create the same state where the websocket subject has errored but the underlying socket remains open. I don't...
> * There's no immediate way to do "dependent queries" via just the core API. The only real workaround is a custom `queryFn` that dispatches the first request thunk, and...