Thomas Beutlich
Thomas Beutlich
> General: > > * [ ] Missing full text search of HTML spec is handled in #2404 @GallLeo I set up a full proof of concept (see https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/2404#issuecomment-766108466). Please...
Why was this closed? My suggestion is to differ between recoverable errors (ModelicaError), that can for example be recovered by reduction of the solver step size, and unrecoverable errors (ModelicaFatal),...
Dymola in dark mode:  SimulationX: 
> Several of the links in the document seem to be broken. Resolved by 70f0c49fa2a10bd681811ce626e8b965bdffd239.
> I miss a general description of the annotation, like where is it allowed (in the example it's on the top-level package and on external functions, but can it be...
> Note: A contrary view is that there has been a push from customers to allow Evaluate to depend on a parameter, which was implemented in Dymola 2019 I think...
> * Are there any other annotations than `Documentation` where HTML tags are supported? I touched that question for the `label` annotation in #2915.
> One obvious use of html in description string is something like: > `parameter Real beta2 "The value for β2";` Which already can be expressed by current Modelica w/o HTML...
Cross reference: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/issues/302