Thomas Beutlich

Documentation of ModelicaTableAdditions blocks is not inherited (not possible in Modelica language), but copied and extended. You can use these table blocks just like any other block.

Closing with applying above mentioned resolutions.

I agree with @dietmarw here. Bugfixes shall be fixed in place and documented in the revision annotation. I also doubt that anyone used such a function if it was plainly...

> > > @beutlich Why is it asking again for signing the CLA? I just signed it at [#3742 (comment)](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/pull/3742#issuecomment-792252602) Because you (accidently ?) committed as `Christian Kral `. I...

> I will squash all commits as one later. Done. I also resolved the merge conflict of #3677 and HTML tag error when rebasing. Please check again.

A third option to unitless parameters or array with heterogenous unit would be something like: ```mo parameter Real d(unit = "kg/s")=0.01 "Damping coefficient in kg/s (not the damping ratio)"; parameter...

Right, here's a nicer proposal, inspired from https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/blob/39fe8050c0e7f487720d2f3ea5d91e25ef359ffe/Modelica/Electrical/Analog/Examples/Utilities/SwitchedCapacitor.mo#L29-L30: ```mo parameter Modelica.Units.SI.Mass m = 0.2 "Mass in kg"; parameter Modelica.Units.SI.TranslationalDampingConstant d = 0.01 "Damping coefficient in kg/s (not the damping ratio)";...

> > > All conflicts resolved now. I removed the awkward merge commit by cherry-picking the relevant commits only.

Can this be seen as follow-up for #3789?

> @beutlich Is it allowed to link to `ModelicaReference.Operators.'assert()'` in the documentation? This could be helpful since the component fully use it. Why not? See also #2108.