Bernd Ruecker

I honestly don't have a clear feeling about which behavior is more intuitive. Just quickly capturing my immediate thoughts: - I haven't found anything in the BPMN spec that is...

Hi @derryx - we discussed this in the past and decided against this. What is the use case here - why do you not simply rename the method parameter? Just...

Thanks - helpful to know this thought! I personally also think that a "VariableAsType" is a good alternative practice - which my colleagues in consulting also are using: https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/camunda-8-process-solution-template/blob/main/src/main/java/org/example/camunda/process/solution/worker/MyWorker.java#L20

@derryx I tend to close this for now unless you object?

@falko: Please comment if you have specific input, otherwise let's discuss again in our next meeting. And just for visibility, commits so far: https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/spring-zeebe/commit/5a609b7a6593a627a54b6827d5d5015e4dae2721 & https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/spring-zeebe/commit/d41493c04bcd1e1d0ca9075f9ab27971eef489ec

+1 if we add documentation on how to turn it on in the readme (as all "pure" workers will probably use that)

I close this for now as it did not come up in any real-life context yet

No need for a feature in Zeebe - the extension properties are read from the BPMN model directly by custom code (as it was done in Camunda BPM for this...

@ingorichtsmeier If I remember correctly, you must not override distribution settings in your pom (like you do here: https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/camunda-platform-7-mail/blob/master/pom.xml#L48) - you must rely on what the parent pom provides, then...

Released