Björn Rabenstein

I think we should allow multiple entries for the same problem with some explanation attached about the different trade-offs. However, that's clearly at odds with our explicitly stated practice in...

This discussion happened multiple times before. Nothing is keeping you from using XxxVec's with 0 labels. It's just weird to always put `vec.WithLabelValues().Inc()` everywhere. The ability to use the "leaves"...

I'll mark this for v0.10 because this would be the (very much breaking) release where we could change the interfaces. However, at the moment I tend to stick with the...

I would say, both `xxxVec.WithLabelValues()` and `xxxVec.With(nil)` should work.

OK, that's a different thing then and not really related to this issue. In the Prometheus view of the world, a metric vector with three labels will only ever have...

In principal, the is a performance penalty of a label-less CounterVec compared to just a Counter. I doubt it will matter in practice. If it does, we could add a...

I mostly assigned this to myself as a “default” because I used to be the maintainer of this repo. Therefore, I'm un-assigning this from myself now. New maintainers @bwplotka &...

While I opened this issue, this has to be figured out between the OpenMetrics experts and the current maintainers of prometheus/client_golang. From a very general perspective, I don't think `Created()`...

I have an idea how to do this quite neatly. But it's a breaking change. I'll move this issue over to the v0.10 milestone and will flesh out as soon...

I mostly assigned this to myself as a “default” because I used to be the maintainer of this repo. Therefore, I'm un-assigning this from myself now. New maintainers @bwplotka &...