Björn Rabenstein
Björn Rabenstein
I assume your comparison resulted in the expected results. If you continue to experience low performance, please follow up to this issue. Closing for now…
Yeah, let's see how things evolve post-COVID. I've been doubtful about the usefulness of this repo before, mostly because very few of us would use it. But let's make the...
Circumstances are not really back to normal. What is normal even in this weird world? But conferences are happening again. Let's discuss the fate of this repo at the upcoming...
> Actually, for me (and probably for others like @fabxc), I think it is less-confusing to have 1.6 as a shortcut for the latest 1.6.x version. Lately, we got confused...
Yeah, I think this goes quite deep. In the depth of its soul, PromQL would like to forget that the timeseries consists of samples with timestamps. But we already break...
I realize the filtering case (like `t>` and `t 42)`. But that's in a way just a lucky coincidence. `foo > 42` comes back with enough labels to do the...
Sorry for the noise. Misclicked…
Tagging this for v3, mostly to raise attention to the idea of not changing the timestamp if an evaluation doesn't touch multiple samples or something…
> Tagging this for v3, mostly to raise attention to the idea of not changing the timestamp if an evaluation doesn't touch multiple samples or something… Given how close the...
tl;dr: Use whatever algorithm you find appropriate. It would require a lot of research to assess all the algorithms out there and pick the "best" one for client_rust. The algorithm...