benpicco
benpicco
Now some tests are failing, is this intended?
If this causes a test to fail that was testing the wrong thing, you also need to add the fix to the test in this PR, otherwise there is no...
CI finds that `tests/unittests` is now failing
Hey, sorry for the reactions being so negative. The problem with the config system is that *everybody* wants to have a config system for their subsystem, we can expect that...
Alternatively you could also see if #19557 covers your use case and if not, what's lacking - @fabian18 is getting paid to work on this and will likely maintain it...
I still think we don't need to worry about stdio too much. It's mainly a debug tool - in 99% of all RIOT deployments, nobody is going to see stdio...
This needs a rebase
Ah I think I know what's going on - the struct is of course going to be padded. How about instead ```patch --- a/sys/include/vfs.h +++ b/sys/include/vfs.h @@ -66,9 +66,11 @@...
Weird, does this only happen with exFAT support enabled? Then it might be that the 4 bytes need to be added to `_FATFS_FILE_EXFAT`
I also took the opportunity to simplify the test a bit, so it still fits on tiny MCUs.