Ben Meghreblian

I like the idea of linking to a label - apart from not having to keep things in sync, it's a nice way to introduce people to GitHub and hopefully...

@vitorbaptista Yes, good idea - returning just linked academic journal articles would be a useful improvement

Once this is done, modify the 'Publications' tooltip (#315) to remove the second sentence i.e. "At present this also includes trials with lay summaries available from the UK Health Research...

This appears to be the case for all the trials with discrepancies (except one): https://explorer.opentrials.net/search?has_discrepancies=true The exception is: [Adjuvant Tamoxifen Compared With Anastrozole in Treating Postmenopausal Women With Ductal Carcinoma...

Just quickly dug into this - for this trial '[Evaluation of a Commercial Program on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes](https://explorer.opentrials.net/trials/f365d2fb-16c1-4058-8a63-6442f3a3ded8)'. [Its discrepancy page](https://explorer.opentrials.net/trials/f365d2fb-16c1-4058-8a63-6442f3a3ded8/discrepancies#recruitment_status) shows an erroneous discrepancy for 'Recruitment status'...

For the small citation (on the trial details page) I'd suggest moving the year from the end to after the author and dropping the author's initial, thus: Kalron et al....

This was raised recently by a librarian at an OpenTrials workshop. They asked why there isn't a full citation (or at least the publication date) for any linked publications. N.B....

Fresh off some user testing with a science librarian - they said they would expect the publication citation to include more bibliographic information - namely journal title, at least first...

@vitorbaptista Looks great, I made a couple of minor suggestions

From my perspective, yes - @vitorbaptista?